Far too many cancer patients must unfortunately still die because they don’t know enough about cancer. It is still assumed that a tumour is evil and despicable and must be operated on or destroyed with poisons and radiation as soon as possible. Only then are you healthy. Consequently in the long and short term when metastases appear, then it is said that the tumour has unfortunately already “spread”, even though the current best and most scientifically proven methods have already been applied: chemotherapy, radiation, antibodies and hormone blockers.
But how do cancer patients actually find out which successful cancer therapies there are in other countries? Is it really true that there are only 5 cancer therapies? Why are therapies being used at thousands of universities in other countries, which most of the professors at so many universities haven’t even heard of? Is the assumption that cancer patients have something evil in their system really still current?
Not at all. Today we have electron microscopes and nanotechnologies and therefore know much more about cancer than we did 50 years ago when they began to teach the dogma of the evil tumour-cells at universities. Newest scientific findings of the 21st century show clearly that cancer cells are not nearly as evil as was previously assumed, rather they are adapted and regulating cells. The assumption that tumour cells should be immediately killed with poisons or radiation is therefore no longer true. Cancer cells are thoroughly adaptable and intelligent cells and so belong to a body just like every other cell. While conventional thinking medical practitioners are still asking themselves why the immune system of a cancer patient doesn’t kill any cancer cells, modern thinking doctors have already been using the knowledge about intelligent cancer cells for several years.
Whoever is right in this dispute among scholars regarding what cancer is exactly; we will probably not yet know it for a long time. The fact is that the survival rates for most types of cancer have not only not improved after 50 years of cancer research, some have gotten worse. While other faculties of medicine or technology in general (just think of the computer and automobile industries) make enormous progress every year, oncology isn’t getting one millimetre further on. Should other areas of our life have been making such minimal progress as oncology, then we wouldn’t have computers, airbags or organ-transplants today.
This new knowledge about cancer cells is meanwhile being put to use more and more worldwide. A steadily growing percentage of cancer patients know today that tumours are symptoms and that a person is not even close to full health just because these have been destroyed. On one hand these new findings give many patients hope whilst on the other hand they demand evermore the patients’ own initiative. Often patients don’t know what they themselves can or should do to recover or to stay healthy. Above all there is simply a lack of independent information about conventional and unconventional therapies.
Carpe diem
Lothar Hirneise
|
